Table 8 |
||||
|
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for dichotomised perceived coercion, perceived procedural justice and impact of the hearing as predicted by independently rated Global Assessment of Function and PANSS scales six months before the hearing (T1), null hypothesis: true area under the curve = 0.5. |
||||
|
AUC |
95% CI |
P |
||
|
|
||||
|
Lower bound |
Upper bound |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Dependent variable: Patient's Perceived Coercion (dichotomised) |
||||
|
|
||||
|
GAF |
0.467 |
0.330 |
0.604 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS total score |
0.534 |
0.392 |
0.676 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS positive |
0.460 |
0.324 |
0.595 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS negative |
0.573 |
0.434 |
0.711 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS general |
0.492 |
0.354 |
0.629 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
Dependent variable: Patient's perceived procedural justice re legal actors in hearing (dichotomised) |
||||
|
|
||||
|
GAF |
0.810 |
0.714 |
0.907 |
< 0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS total score |
0.807 |
0.709 |
0.904 |
< 0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS positive |
0.711 |
0.567 |
0.856 |
0.014 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS negative |
0.779 |
0.675 |
0.882 |
0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS general |
0.509 |
0.318 |
0.699 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
Dependent Variable: Patients' perceived procedural justice re consultant psychiatrist's role in hearing (dichotomised) |
||||
|
|
||||
|
GAF |
0.802 |
0.670 |
0.935 |
0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS total score |
0.837 |
0.738 |
0.936 |
< 0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS positive |
0.828 |
0.668 |
0.987 |
< 0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS negative |
0.738 |
0.621 |
0.856 |
0.012 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS general |
0.530 |
0.354 |
0.704 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
Dependent variable: Patients' perceived impact of the hearing (dichotomised) |
||||
|
|
||||
|
GAF |
0.673 |
0.511 |
0.835 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS total score |
0.721 |
0.588 |
0.854 |
0.016 |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS positive |
0.677 |
0.503 |
0.852 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS negative |
0.608 |
0.457 |
0.759 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
PANSS general |
0.588 |
0.410 |
0.766 |
NS |
|
|
||||
|
n = 75. Means and standard deviations. |
||||
|
Donnelly et al. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 2011 5:29 doi:10.1186/1752-4458-5-29 |
||||
